Noah Schachter vs Alex Kuperstein Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Jul at 08:58 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Schachter vs A. Kuperstein

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-To-Head: Schachter 1 - 0 Kuperstein
They have played 2 sets in total, with Noah Schachter winning 2 and Alex Kuperstein winning 0. The last match between Noah Schachter and Alex Kuperstein was at the M15 Santa Tecla, 22-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Noah Schachter getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Schachter | 1 |
Kuperstein | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Santa Tecla(07-22-25)
N. Schachter vs A. Kuperstein H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
52.89% (128-114) | Career Total W/L | 63.64% (28-16) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Schachter vs A. Kuperstein Match Preview
- In recent months, Schachter has a higher success rate on second serves than Kuperstein, winning 43.38% compared to 38.24%. Does this mean Schachter has a serving advantage? Likely, yes.
- Analyzing return stats, Kuperstein edges out slightly on second serve returns with 47.22% compared to Schachter's 46.27%, which points to Kuperstein's effectiveness at breaking second serve points.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Kuperstein stands out, winning 38.37% of points versus Schachter’s 26.59%. Could this indicate that Kuperstein is a stronger returner overall? It's a possibility.
- Under pressure, Schachter performs better, saving 53.11% of breakpoints, whereas Kuperstein saves just 31.25%. Does this suggest Schachter handles critical moments better? Yes, it does.
- Reviewing past match outcomes, Kuperstein has a higher overall annual win percentage at 54.55%, over Schachter's 46.77%.
- Both players excel on Hard courts, but Kuperstein shows more proficiency with a 70% win rate, compared to Schachter's 56%.
- In tournament experience, Schachter has a slight edge in match participation, though Kuperstein has a slightly higher win percentage at similar lower-tier events.
- Facing generally tougher opponents, Kuperstein’s average adversary rank stands at 296.36, which might have tested him more than Schachter’s 347.08.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Kuperstein has a perfect track record over the last year, having won all such sets, whereas Schachter has managed to win only 39%.
- Turning break points into games, Schachter is more efficient, converting 38.1% of opportunities compared to Kuperstein's 28.57%. How crucial is this stat? It's critical for predicting break opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (July 22, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating recent trends, Schachter demonstrates solid capability on second serves and is more adept at handling high-pressure situations, particularly in saving breakpoints. His slight advantage in break point conversion also signifies his prowess in capitalizing on crucial moments.
Kuperstein, however, shows greater potential in returning games, especially first serves, which could present a formidable challenge for Schachter. His experience against better-ranked opponents and his flawless record in deciding sets underline his resilience and competitiveness.
Considering their performance on Hard courts—both their preferred surface—perhaps Kuperstein's higher win ratio there gives him a favorable position. His overall win rate and significant advantages in critical return games suggest that he might have the upper hand.
Given these factors, Kuperstein is anticipated to emerge as the likely winner in this upcoming tennis encounter.
Noah Schachter vs Alex Kuperstein Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Schachter vs A. Kuperstein H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 7 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:18:38 | Avg. Match Time | 1:18:38 |
75% (38/51) | 1st Serve % | 49% (26/53) |
84% (32/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 81% (21/26) |
54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (16/27) |
100% (1/1) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
30% (16/53) | Return Pts Won % | 24% (12/51) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Schachter Recent Matches Played
A. Kuperstein Recent Matches Played

N. Schachter vs A. Kuperstein Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
52.89% (128/114) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.64% (28/16) |
52.98% (293/260) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.00% (57/38) |
51.61% (2662/2496) | Games Win/Loss | 52.67% (444/399) |
55.84% (86/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.65% (23/11) |
47.62% (30/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (5/5) |
48.00% (12/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
754 | Aces Total | 26 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
601 | Total Double Faults | 29 |
1:15:50 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
97.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 264.32 |
60% (7089/11747) | 1st Serve % | 71% (938/1321) |
69% (4856/7089) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (555/938) |
47% (2176/4658) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (192/383) |
41% (473/1159) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (73/142) |
40% (4660/11696) | Return Points Win % | 44% (591/1331) |
44.12% (15/19) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
54.33% (113/95) | Futures W/L | 63.64% (28/16) |
53% (127/240) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (28/43) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
56% (24/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 83% (5/6) |
46% (32/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 88% (7/8) |
84% (131/110) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (25/25) |
16% (131/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (25/0) |
16% (111/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (19/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
